This Sources‑Sought effort seeks industry input on the optimal delivery method for a $196.4 million Military Construction (MILCON) project at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. The work involves design‑build construction of multiple new munitions storage facilities on Quarry Hill and demolition of existing igloo‑type storage structures on Engineer Hill, all while addressing high water tables, permafrost, and potential environmental contamination. The government is evaluating three delivery‑method options—Accelerated Design‑Build to Budget (FAR‑based), Construction Manager at Risk (OTA), and Progressive Design‑Build (OTA)—and is soliciting feedback on risk mitigation, schedule, cost certainty, and incentives.
• Scope includes new warm‑storage vehicle facility, cold inert storage, four heated magazines, a production building, concrete aprons, and extensive demolition (≈ 27,500 sf).
• Critical constraints: permafrost foundations, high groundwater, PFAS/asbestos/PCB contamination, limited Alaskan construction season, and coordination with Air Force Standard Designs.
• Desired outcomes: identify the delivery method that best balances stakeholder engagement, schedule certainty (design FY 27, construction not before FY 29), cost control, and risk reduction.